Introduction

Patreon

Email Group

Study Groups

Math 4 Wisdom

Wondrous Wisdom

Priorities

Steering Committee

Creative Exposition

Contact

  • Andrius Kulikauskas
  • m a t h 4 w i s d o m @
  • g m a i l . c o m
  • +370 607 27 665
  • Eičiūnų km, Alytaus raj, Lithuania

Thank you, Participants!

Thank you, Veterans!

Thank you, Commoners!

Thank you, Supporters!

edit SideBar

Combinatorial alternative to wave function, Research program fivesome, Kim Zeng trees, Moments

These are my notes for the

Kim Zeng involution

The Linearization formula

{$\mathcal{L}(P_n(x)^2)=n!(c)_n(\alpha\beta)^n$} where {$(c)_n$} is the rising factorial

Combinatorially, Kim and Zeng's formula for linearization coefficients yields

{$\mathcal{L}(P_n(x)^2)=(\alpha\beta)^n\sum_{\sigma\in\mathcal{D}_{(n,n)}}c^{\textrm{cyc}\;\sigma} $}

{$\sum_{\sigma\in\mathcal{D}_{(n,n)}}c^{\textrm{cyc}\;\sigma}=n!(c)_n$}

For example, if we define our generalized derangements on the odds {$\{1,3,5,7,\dots\}$} and the evens {$\{a,b,c,d,\dots\}$}, and consider all permutations of the evens, we have:

{$c$}{$(1 a)$}
{$2c(c+1) = 2(c^2 + c)$}{$(1 a)(3 b),(1 a 3 b)$}
{$6c(c+1)(c+2) = 6(c^3 + 3c^2 + 2c)$}{$(1 a)(3 b)(5 c), (1 a 3 b)(5 c), (1 a 5 b)(3 c), (1 a)(3 b 5 c), (1 a 3 b 5 c), (1 a 5 b 3 c)$}
{$24c(c+1)(c+2)(c+3) = 24(c^4 + 6c^3 + 11c^2 + 6c)$}{$(1 a)(3 b)(5 c)(7 d),$}
 {$(1 a 3 b)(5 c)(7 d), (1 a 5 b)(3 c)(7 d), (1 a 7 b)(3 c)(5 d), (1 a)(3 b 5 c)(7 d), (1 a)(3b 7c)(5 d), (1 a)(3 b)(5 c 7 d), $}
 {$(1 a 3 b 5 c)(7 d), (1 a 5 b 3 c)(7 d), (1 a 3 b 7 c)(5 d), (1 a 7 b 3 c)(5 d), (1 a 5 b c 7)(d 3),(1 a 7 b 5 c)(3 d), (1 a)(3 b 5 c 7 d), (1 a)(3 b 7 c 5 d)$}
 {$(1 a 3 b)(5 c 7 d), (1 a 5 b)(3 c 7 d), (1 a 7 b)(3 c 5 d), $}
 {$(1 a 3 b 5 c 7 d), (1 a 3 b 7 c 5 d), (1 a 5 b 3 c 7 d), (1 a 5 b 7 c 3 d), (1 a 7 b 3 c 5 d), (1 a 7 b 5 c 3 d)$}

If {$c=1$}, then we get {$n!n!$} terms. In other words, {$(1)_n=n!$}

Moments

The formula can be interpreted by calculating the moments {$\mathcal{L}(x^n)$}.

{$\mathcal{L}(x^n)=\sum_{\sigma\in S_n} (-\alpha)^{\textrm{asc}\;\sigma} (-\beta)^{\textrm{desc}\;\sigma} f^{\textrm{fix}\;\sigma} c^{\textrm{cyc}\;\sigma} $}

For {$A_{(n,n)}$}, skew derangements and generalized derangements are the same

Any generalized derangement without color matches is a skew derangement. Note that in the case of {$A_{(n,n)}$} there are no double ascents (and no double descents) and so there are no color matches.

A skew derangement is a permutation {$\pi$} of {$A_{(n,n}$} that has no color matches, and for which if {$c(a)=c(\pi(a))$}, then {$c(\pi^{-1}(a))\neq c(a)$}, {$c(\pi(a))\neq c(\pi^2(a))$} and the smaller of {$\{a,\pi(a)\}$} is a valley and the larger is a peak. But this case supposes that there are three colors:

{$c(\pi^{-1}(a)) > c(a)=c(\pi(a)) > c(\pi^2(a))$} and {$a <\pi(a)$}

or

{$c(\pi^{-1}(a)) < c(a)=c(\pi(a)) < c(\pi^2(a))$} and {$a > \pi(a)$}

Consequently, since we have two colors, then we simply have that {$c(a)\neq c(\pi(a))$} for all {$a\in (n,n)$}, which means that the skew derangements of {$A_{(n,n)}$} are the generalized derangements of {$A_{(n,n)}$}.

Causal trees



L-graphs



Edit - Upload - History - Print - Recent changes
Search:
This page was last changed on February 02, 2024, at 07:54 PM