Introduction

Notes

Math

Epistemology

Search

Andrius Kulikauskas

  • m a t h 4 w i s d o m - g m a i l
  • +370 607 27 665
  • My work is in the Public Domain for all to share freely.

用中文

  • 读物 书 影片 维基百科

Introduction E9F5FC

Questions FFFFC0

Software


See: Krasauskas Kulikauskas, Univalence Axiom

What can homotopy type theory say about Bott periodicity and various concepts in wondrous wisdom?


同伦类型论 . . . Homotopy type theory


  • Study the kinds of equivalences. Associate them to the relationship between level and metalevel.
  • Relate spectral sequences, exact sequences and divisions of everything.
  • Understand what homotopy type theory has to say about the homotopy groups of spheres and thus Bott periodicity.
  • What is the relationship between loops - identity paths in Homotopy Type Theory - and strings in string theory?

HOTTest Summer School Calendar

Rijke. Introduction to Homotopy Type Theory.

HOTTest Summer School, Videos

  • Lecture 1 Structure of dependent type theory. Dependent function types, rules for {$\Pi$} types. Rijke 1-2.
  • Lecture 2 Inductive types. Rijke 3-4.
  • Lecture 3 Identity type. Rijke 5.
  • Lecture 4 Universes. Rijke 6. Propositions as types, Curry-Howard interpretation. Rijke 7.
  • Lecture 5 Equivalences: Homotopies. Equivalences as bi-invertible maps. Identifications in Sigma-types. Preview of functionality and univalence. Rijke 7.

Worksheet 1

Textbooks on logic and type theory

Course books

维基百科

读物

影片

游戏

Community

Concepts:

  • Different levels of equivalences
  • Paths between points (homotopies) and equivalence of homotopies

Adjoints

  • In Shulman, how are dependent sum and dependent product adjoints?
  • In Shulman, see discussion of space and adjoint string and local topos.

笔记

https://github.com/FrozenWinters/stlc SLTC project where Astra formalises the categorical semantics of function types in Agda.

Induction argument on truncation levels uses the level below (for identities) and the level above (which we're trying to reach). Similarly, the recurrence relation relates the level xP_n(x) with the level below and the level above.

An empty type has no evidence for it, is not true. A nonempty type, as a proposition, is true. The notion of empty or nonempty is relevant for the sevensome, for describing {$\forall \wedge \exists$}.

Every type has a unique name. Every universe is a type with a unique name. Every term in a type should have a unique name. So why can't we have a universe of unique names for all of the terms, types and universes? And if we can, then don't we run into a paradox? Or not?

  • Types indicate comparability which is a condition for equality.

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relation+between+type+theory+and+category+theory

For different type theories we can construct different categorical models.

  • What is the common requirements for the additional structures to be valid semantic models of a type theory?

observational (a posteriori) and definitional (a priori) judgments as in type theory

Edit - Upload - History - Print - Recent changes
Search:
This page was last changed on September 08, 2023, at 10:18 AM