|
Introduction
Notes
Math
Epistemology
Search
Andrius Kulikauskas
- m a t h 4 w i s d o m - g m a i l
- +370 607 27 665
- My work is in the Public Domain for all to share freely.
用中文
Software
|
克利福德代数
- How do spinors relate to Clifford algebras?
- What is the periodicity of spinors?
- What is the connection between Bott periodicity and spinors? See John Baez, The Octonions.
- What is the relationship between its covering group {$\textrm{Spin}(n)$} and the special unitary group?
Twistors
- Do twistors relate the threesome and the foursome?
- Is there an eight-dimensional concept that expands on spinors and twistors?
读物
Breakdown
Given real or complex vector space {$V$} and quadratic form {$Q$}.
- Understand the spin group {$\textrm{Spin}(V,Q)$}, which is the double cover of {$SO(V,Q)$}.
- Understand the Lie algebra {$\frak{so}$}{$(V,Q)$} which they share.
- For real {$V$}, understand how {$\frak{so}$}{$(V_C,Q_C)$} is the complexification of {$\frak{so}$}{$(V,Q)$}.
A complex spin representation of {$\textrm{Spin}(n,\mathbb{C})$}
- This is a complex vector space {$S$} and a group homomorphism {$\rho:\textrm{Spin}(n,\mathbb{C})\rightarrow GL(S)$} such that {$\rho(-1)\neq 1$}.
Break down {$V=\mathbb{C}^n$} into maximal totally isotropic subspaces {$W$} and {$W^*$}
- The inner product is the symmetric bilinear form on {$V$} associated to Q by polarization.
- In a complex vector space, if {$Q(e_j)=1$} and {$Q(e_k)=1$}, we have that {$Q(e_j-ie_k)=0$} and {$Q(e_j+ie_k)=0$}. The latter elements are isotropic and if we multiply them by scalars we can get one-dimensional totally isotropic subspaces. If we are careful to pair generators {$e_j$} and {$e_k$} and not mix them, then we can get larger isotropic subspaces. Indeed, we can get a pair of subspaces of equal dimension.
- Then {$n=2m$} or {$n=2m+1$} but either way there are maximal totally isotropic subspaces {$W$} and {$W^*$}, each of dimension {$m$}, which are also dual vector spaces. If {$n=2m$}, then {$V=W\oplus W^*$}. If {$n=2m+1$}, then {$U$} is the one-dimensional subspace orthogonal to both {$W$} and {$W^*$}, and {$V=W\oplus U\oplus W^*$}.
Build {$\frak{so}$}{$(n,C)$} out of matrices acting on` {$W$} and {$W^*$}
- Any {$m\times m$} matrix {$A$} induces an endomorphism of {$W$} and likewise {$A^T$} induces an endomorphism of {$W^*$}. We have {$<Aw,w^*>=<w,A^Tw^*>$}.
- We can define endomorphism {$\rho_A$} of {$V$} which equals {$A$} on {$W$}, {$-A^T$} on {$W^*$} and {$0$} on {$U$} (if {$n$} is odd).
- Note that {$\rho_A$} is skew. {$<\rho_A u,v>=-<u,\rho_Av>$} for all {$u,v\in V$}. Thus {$\rho_A\in so(n,C)\subset \textrm{End}(V)$}.
- The diagonal matrices {$\rho_D$} define a Cartan subalgebra {$\mathbf{h}$} of {$\frak{so}$}{$(n,C)$}.
- We can write out {$\frak{so}$}{$(n,C)$} explicitly, including its root system.
The representation space {$S$} is the exterior algebra of {$W$}
- Consider the exterior algebra {$S=\wedge\bullet W$}. This is the space of Dirac spinors.
- Similarly, consider {$S'=\wedge\bullet W^*$}.
{$V$} acts on {$S$} by the geometric product
- Consider the action of {$V$} on {$S$}, where for {$v=w+w^*\in W\oplus W^*, \psi\in S$}, we have {$v\dot \psi=2^{\frac{1}{2}}(w\wedge\psi+\iota(w^*)\psi)$} where the second terms is interior multiplication.
- Understand geometric algebra and the geometric product.
- This action respects the Clifford relations {$v^2 = Q(v)1$}.
- This induces a homomorphism from {$Cl_n C$} of {$V$} to {$\textrm{End}(S)$}. This defines {$S$} as a Clifford module.
- Similarly, {$S'$} is a Clifford module. {$S$} and {$S'$} are equivalent representations.
A real spin representation of {$\textrm{Spin}(p,q)$}
- We have a real vector space {$S$} and a real spin representation {$\rho:\textrm{Spin}(p,q)\rightarrow GL(S)$}, such that {$\rho(-1)\neq 1$}.
- Consider its complexification {$S_C$}.
- {$S$} is a real representation of {$\frak{so}$}{$(p,q)$} and it therefore extends to a complex representation of {$\frak{so}$}{$(n,\mathbb{C}$}.
- Thus start with complex spin representations of {$\textrm{Spin}(n,\mathbb{C})$} and {$\frak{so}$}{$(n,\mathbb{C}$}.
- Restrict these to complex spin representations of {$\textrm{Spin}(p,q)$} and {$\frak{so}$}{$(p,q)$}.
- Reduce these to real spin representations.
Ideas
- Symmetry breaking distinguishes vectors and spinors.
- Think of Clifford algebra generators that square to {$-1$} as spinors, and those that square to {$+1$} as vectors. Each generator can be thought of as yielding a turn of {$\pi=180^\circ$}. Does that make sense?
- Cameron Krulewski. K-Theory, Bott periodicity, and elliptic operators Explains Attiyah's proof which uses the index of elliptic operators. The real case is the spinor case and mentions Dirac operators.
Spinor
Harvey, F. Reese (1990), "Chapter 2: The Eight Types of Inner Product Spaces", Spinors and calibrations, Academic Press, pp. 19–40, ISBN 0-12-329650-1
MacMahon Master Theorem
- The coefficient of {$x_1^{k_1}\cdots x_m^{k_m}$} in {$\frac{1}{\det (I_m - TA)}$} equals its coefficient in {$\prod_{i=1}^m \bigl(a_{i1}x_1 + \dots + a_{im}x_m \bigl)^{k_i}$}
- My thesis has combinatorial interpretations for the generating function {$\frac{1}{\det (I - A)} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^nh_n(\xi_1,...,\xi_n)$}
- Julian Schwinger: It is the MacMahon Master Theorem that unifies the angular momentum properties of composite systems in the binary build-up of such systems from more elementary constituents. (James D Louck. Unitary symmetry and combinatorics. 2008.)
- AI: The theorem is referenced in the study of "spinor spherical harmonics" or "Pauli central field spinors," which are mathematical tools used in quantum mechanics to describe particles with spin (like electrons) in a central potential.
- AI: In its standard mathematical form, the MMT relates the permanent of a matrix to the coefficient of a formal power series involving a determinant. In physics, determinants of operators (like Laplacians) on tensors and spinors are used in certain quantum field theories and string theories. The MMT provides a powerful combinatorial identity that can be used to prove other related identities in these fields.
- In the Standard Model, fermions are not their own antiparticles, but in some theories they can be. Among other things, this involves the question of whether the relevant spinor representations of the groups Spin(p,q) are complex, real (‘Majorana spinors’) or quaternionic (‘pseudo-Majorana spinors’). The options are well-understood, and follow a nice pattern depending on the dimension and signature of spacetime modulo 8.
Twistors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twistor_theory
Peter Woit. Topics in Representation Theory
|